一些簡單的凸分析及其应用

时隔两年多,恢复更新了。这是一些簡單的凸分析的续篇。

目前只是草稿,会有很多错误。

Don’t follow my arguments for now, it’s just a draft of a draft.

在这篇中,我们要得到高微(一)中消费者理论和厂商理论的一些性质,比如关于支出函数、成本函数和利润函数。具体地说,我们的目标是得到 conjugate duality theorem 和 support function theorem。我们将先从 indicator function 开始,然后是 conjugate,随后引入 support function,作为 concave/convex indicator function 的 conjugate,之后是 Young-Fenchel conjugate theorem 和 Legendra transformation。

一些簡單的凸分析及其应用

The properties of consumer expenditure function e(p,u)e(p,u)

(i) Homogenous of degree one in p.

(ii) strictly increasing in u and nondecreasing in pkp_k for any k.

(iii) concave in p.

(iv) continuous in p and u.

The properties of the profit fuction π(p,w)\pi(p,w)

(i) homogeneous of degree one in p and w.

(ii) in p and in w.

(iii) convex in p and w.

(iv) π(p)\pi(p) is convex in p, and π(p)/pk=zk(p)\partial \pi(p)/ \partial p_{k} = z_{k}(p).

The properties of the cost fuction (¸w,y)\c(w,y)

(i) Homogenous of degree one in p.

(ii) strictly increasing in u and nondecreasing in pkp_k for any k.

(iii) concave in p.

(iv) continuous in p and u.

The support function theorem

Let AA be a convex set in Rm\mathbb{R}^{m} and 1A(x)\mathbb{1}_{A}(x) be the concave indicator function of AA, i.e.
if xAx\in A then 1A(x)=0\mathbb{1}_{A}(x)=0; if x∉Ax\not\in A then 1A(x)=\mathbb{1}_{A}(x)=-\infty (for a convex indicator function, then if xAx\in A then 1A(x)=+\mathbb{1}_{A}(x)=+\infty, but always for a convex set, and there is no such a notion as “concave set”)

And let f(p)=\mathbb{1}_{A}^{\start}(p) be the associated support function, i.e. $\mathbb{1}{A}^{\start}§=\inf{\p*x-\mathbb{1}{A}(x)}$.

which is, for a given pp,
choose xx such that px1A(x)p*x-\mathbb{1}_{A}(x) as small as possible. since we know that whenever x∉Ax\not\in A, then 1A(x)=\mathbb{1}_{A}(x)=-\infty, so px1A(x)=px()p*x-\mathbb{1}_{A}(x)=p*x-(-\infty) is positive infinity, while for xAx\in A then 1A(x)=0\mathbb{1}_{A}(x)=0, so to get the infimum, we must choose xx from AA, in this case, the infimum of px1A(x)p*x-\mathbb{1}_{A}(x) is equivalent to the infimum of pxp*x. We can interprate it this way: we are minimizing a linear function (e.g. choosing quantities vector, facing price vector, with a constraint that we must choose xx from the convex set AA, such as the upper contour set of a quasi-concave utility function; or the upper contour set of the production function, although when we interprate it as a cost function the pp here is actually the ww and should not be confused with the price of production)

and let x(p)={xA:px=f(p)}x(p)=\{x\in A:p*x=f(p)\} be the set of solutions to minxApx\min_{x\in A}p*x (if any. interpretation: the cost minimizing factor demand with the requirement of producing at least as a level of producing some yy, or the expenditure minimizing good demand with the requirement of generating at least as a level of some utility level uˉ\bar{u}). Then

(i) the support function f(p)f(p) (interpretation: the expenditure function, i.e. already substituting into the optimal solution; the cost function, also already substituting the optimal solution. So it is the value function) is concave in pp (i.e. increasing price will increase cost/expenditure, but in a slower and slower speed), upper semicontinuous, and homogeneous of degree one. f is continuous on the interior of its domain and weaking increasing (or some people say onedecreasing) in pp (increasing factor price will never reduce cost; increasing goods price will never reduce expenditure)